Text:
"So excuse me forgetting
But these things I do
You see, I've forgotten
If they're green or they're blue"
See also . . .
Text:
"So excuse me forgetting
But these things I do
You see, I've forgotten
If they're green or they're blue"
See also . . .
This afternoon's post with the phrase
"Eternal Word Meets Eternal World"
suggests a book —
A search in this journal for "world within" yields . . .
"Instead of the 'static spacetime jewel' of blockworld that is often invoked by eternalists to help their readers conceptualize of what a blockworld would 'look like' from the outside, now imagine that a picture on a slide is being projected onto the surface of this space-time jewel. From the perspective of one inside the jewel, one might ask 'Why is this section blue while this section is black?,' and from within the jewel, one could not formulate an answer since one could not see the entire picture projected on the jewel; however, from outside the jewel, an observer (some analogue of Newton's God, perhaps, looking down on his 'sensorium' from the 5th dimension) could easily see the pattern and understand that all of the 'genuinely fortuitous' events inside the space-time jewel are, in fact, completely determined by the pattern in the projector." — "Genuine Fortuitousness, Relational Blockworld, Realism, and Time" (pdf), by Daniel J. Peterson, Honors Thesis, Swarthmore College, December 13, 2007, footnote 55, page 114 |
A related image from pure mathematics —
* The title is thanks to William Gass.
The name of the author in the above search result suggests . . .
See as well yesterday's Art for Jokers .
Eternal Word Meets Eternal World.
Related words … Posts tagged Meta.
Clay himself might prefer Chicks for Hicks.
Powered by WordPress