See Charlottesville in this journal.
See Charlottesville in this journal.
Related reading: The Pristine Edge of Darkness.
Exploring bitspace via posts so tagged yields . . .
This, together with the acronym COS from Charlottesville, suggests
a look at what Princeton means by COS.
Why COS? . . . November 6, 2015 . . . Serena Zheng
(https://admission.princeton.edu/blogs/why-cos) —
Three years ago around this time, I was applying to Princeton,
and I had no idea what I wanted to study.
I was, however, pretty set against studying computer science,
or "COS," as we call it at Princeton.
"Three years ago around this time" translates to November 6, 2012.
Hence another Princeton-related tale . . .
* Id est . . . Cannes, as opposed to Charlottesville.
"The Virginia Cavalier is a concept that attaches the qualities
of chivalry and honor to the aristocratic class in Virginia history
and literature. Its origin lies in the seventeenth century, when
leading Virginians began to associate themselves with the
Royalists, or Cavaliers, who fought for and remained loyal to
King Charles I during the English Civil Wars (1642–1648)."
— https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/virginia-cavalier-the/
“I appreciate simple, iconic and timeless forms —
things that can adapt or serve multiple purposes
and avoid being easily labelled. At the same time,
I love parts and fragments that reveal how things
move or work. Mostly, anything that tells its
own story and isn’t generalized or clad in some
sort of ornamental icing.”
— Charlottesville, VA, architect Fred Wolf, who seems
to have been associated with the business name
“Gauss LLC ” in Charlottesville.
Posts tagged Space Writer include —
From a Log24 search for "Midnight Special."
Update of 12:45 AM the same night —
"I appreciate simple, iconic and timeless forms —
things that can adapt or serve multiple purposes
and avoid being easily labelled. At the same time,
I love parts and fragments that reveal how things
move or work. Mostly, anything that tells its
own story and isn’t generalized or clad in some
sort of ornamental icing."
— Charlottesville, VA, architect Fred Wolf, who seems
to have been associated with the business name
"Gauss LLC " in Charlottesville.
And I appreciate bulk apperception.
A web search for the author Cameron McEwen mentioned
in today's noon post was unsuccessful, but it did yield an
essay, quite possibly by a different Cameron McEwen, on
"The fundamental difference between analog
and digital systems may be understood as
underlying philosophical discourse since the Greeks."
The University of Bergen identifies the Wittgenstein
McEwen as associated with InteLex of Charlottesville.
The title of this post may serve to point out an analogy*
between the InteLex McEwen's analog-digital contrast
and the Euclidean-Galois contrast discussed previously
in this journal.
The latter contrast is exemplified in Pilate Goes to Kindergarten.
* An analogy, as it were, between analogies.
Outside the World
(A sequel to the previous entry)
Title: The Point Outside the World:
Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein
on Nonsense, Paradox, and Religion
Author: M. Jamie Ferreira
(Love’s Grateful Striving)
(U. of Va., Charlottesville)
Appeared in: Wittgenstein Studies 2/97,
also in Religious Studies,
Vol. 30, March 1994,
pp. 29-44.
See particularly the following passage:
The second rationale for the indirection of communication of the religious is also antitheoretical and a practical re-orientation (to acquire new skills, “to be able”) rather than the reception of information.
This appreciative understanding of the speaker distinguishes the austere view from that which rejects religious language, but the austere view also reveals an understanding of religious utterances as grammatical remarks, meaningful as rules of linguistic usage. Wittgenstein points to “Theology as grammar” when he writes that “Grammar tells us what kind of object anything is” and that “The way you use the word ‘God’ does not show whom you mean — but rather what you mean.” 30
He illustrates: “God’s essence is supposed to guarantee his existence — but what this really means is that what is here at issue is not the existence of something.” 31
Grammatical remarks are rules for use; they are neither empirical conclusions nor attempts to offer a perspective from “outside the world.”
30 Philosophical Investigations, no. 373;
Culture and Value, p. 50.
31 Culture and Value, p. 82.
As noted in the previous entry, the number 373 does seem to point, whether Wittgenstein meant it to or not, to “a point outside the world.”
Of course, the pointing is in the eye of the beholder… As, for instance, the time of this entry, 5:24, “points” to Kali, the Dark Lady, as played (yet again — see previous entry) by Linda Hamilton.
Powered by WordPress