An opinion piece on AI in today's online New York Times  is by
Dario Amodei,  co-founder and CEO of Anthropic.

Wikipedia says that . . .

"In 2025, Time  magazine listed Amodei as
one of the world's 100 most influential people."

The third link below is about an influence on, not by, Amodei.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/05/opinion/
anthropic-ceo-regulate-transparency.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dario_Amodei

http://m759.net/wordpress/?s=Tombrello.

The Atlantic  article above is dated June 3, 2025. For a much more detailed
AI report on the diamond theorem, see a different June 3 document —
a Log24 post titled . . .

FutureHouse Falcon Deep Search Report .

"… The falcon cannot hear the falconer; 
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold…."

— William Butler Yeats, written in 1919.

From https://www.anthropic.com/customers/futurehouse —

Perhaps the "degrees of Kevin Bacon" concept applies here . . .

FutureHouse diamond theorem report on May 3, 2025 —

From https://platform.futurehouse.org/trajectories/995a20ed-9de3-43b9-83d2-64d4b8b92bf2.

Falcon – Deep Search

Task

What is the Cullinane diamond theorem?

Response

This report presents a detailed exposition of the Cullinane diamond theorem, a result that interweaves combinatorics, finite projective geometry, symmetry, and algebra. In its original formulation, the theorem concerns a 4×4 array composed of 16 two‐color, diagonally divided square tiles—a configuration referred to as the diamond figure D—and describes the remarkable invariance properties of D when acted on by a very large permutation group. This report explains the theorem’s statement, the group–theoretic framework underlying it, its geometric interpretation in terms of finite projective spaces, and its algebraic extensions via delta transforms. In doing so, the discussion also elucidates connections with Latin square geometry and deep algebraic structures such as those underlying the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) and Mathieu groups.

Abstract
The Cullinane diamond theorem asserts that every image of the four‐diamond figure D, arising from a 4×4 two‐color diagonally divided square array, exhibits either ordinary or color–interchange symmetry under a group G of order 322,560. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5) This transformation group, generated by arbitrary permutations of the rows, columns, and the four 2×2 quadrants of the array, is isomorphic to the affine group acting on a 4–dimensional vector space over the finite field GF(2). The theorem further establishes that the 840 distinct images of D decompose naturally into 35 equivalence classes—each corresponding bijectively to one of the 35 lines in the three–dimensional projective space PG(3,2). In each equivalence class the images can be represented by three interrelated line diagrams whose entries, under binary (mod 2) addition, sum to zero. This binary-addition property not only reflects the underlying structure of PG(3,2) but also serves as a combinatorial invariant that connects the pattern symmetries with the algebra of finite fields. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5) Moreover, by considering the so-called delta transforms on arrays—where each element of a square array is replaced by a uniquely determined diagonally divided two–color tile—an ideal is produced within a larger ring of symmetric patterns. Such an ideal, consisting in one instance of 1024 “diamond” patterns within a ring of 4096 symmetric configurations, paves the way for an infinite family of “diamond” rings that are isomorphic to matrix rings over GF(4). (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5, cullinaneUnknownyearexamples pages 1-1) In addition, the symmetry group involved in the theorem is intimately related to the octad stabilizer subgroup within the Mathieu group M24, as emphasized in studies of the Miracle Octad Generator. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5, kellyUnknownyearmathieugroupsthe pages 1-1)

1. Introduction

The Cullinane diamond theorem occupies a position of central importance in several overlapping domains of mathematics. Its beauty lies in how a deceptively simple graphic design—the four–diamond figure D obtained from a 4×4 array of specially divided square tiles—encodes deep symmetry properties when subjected to highly structured group actions. The theorem was originally developed to provide a purely geometric explanation for longstanding puzzles in symmetric pattern design, yet its ramifications extend to Latin square theory, coding theory, and even computer–aided secret sharing in cryptography. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5) By using group actions derived from the affine group over GF(2), Cullinane demonstrated that the resulting images not only preserve symmetry but also organize themselves in a manner that reflects the structure of the finite projective space PG(3,2). This report systematically outlines the theorem, providing the necessary mathematical background and exploring its broader significance.

2. The Diamond Figure D and the Permutation Group G

At the heart of the theorem is the diamond figure D—a 4×4 array whose 16 unit squares are each divided along a diagonal into two contrasting colors. This design is not arbitrary; it is constructed so that when transformations are applied, its inherent symmetry properties become evident. The large permutation group G, of order 322,560, is generated by all possible permutations of the rows, the columns, and the four 2×2 quadrants. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5) An essential observation is that G is isomorphic to the full affine group on a four–dimensional vector space over GF(2), where GF(2) is the finite field with two elements. The affine structure imparts a rich algebraic framework that facilitates rigorous combinatorial analysis. Each element of G rearranges the tiles of D, yet—remarkably—the resulting pattern always exhibits a precise form of symmetry, be it an ordinary symmetry (a geometric transformation mapping the pattern to itself) or a color–interchange symmetry (where interchanging the two colors yields an invariant image).

3. Image Enumeration and Finite Projective Geometric Interpretation

One of the most striking outcomes of Cullinane’s work is the enumeration of the distinct images of D under the action of G. Detailed analysis reveals that there are exactly 840 such images. These 840 images do not form a homogeneous collection; instead, they naturally partition into 35 distinct equivalence classes. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5) This partitioning is not coincidental. In fact, there is a bijective correspondence between the 35 equivalence classes of images and the 35 lines in PG(3,2)—the projective space of dimension three over GF(2). In finite projective geometry, PG(3,2) is a highly symmetric structure that contains 15 points and 35 lines, and the incidence relations among these geometric subspaces mirror the combinatorial relationships found among the images of D. Thus, the combinatorial arrangement of tiles in D under all G–images embodies a finite geometric structure that is isomorphic to PG(3,2). (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5)

4. Representation by Line Diagrams and Binary Addition Properties

Each of the 35 equivalence classes can be concretely visualized via collections of three interrelated diagrams known as line diagrams. These diagrams are so constructed that, when added together modulo 2 (i.e., performing binary addition on their entries), the resulting sum is zero. This property is highly significant; it encapsulates the idea that the three diagrams represent three distinct partitions of the four tiles into two subsets, and the symmetry is maintained by the fact that their binary sum (in the field GF(2)) vanishes. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5) In effect, the line diagrams serve as a pictorial and algebraic manifestation of the structure of PG(3,2). The binary-addition condition is reminiscent of the behavior of vectors in a finite vector space, reinforcing the interpretation of the underlying symmetries in linear algebraic terms. This representation is of particular interest in algebraic combinatorics, as it provides a concrete invariant that can be used to classify and analyze symmetric patterns generated by G.

5. Algebraic Extensions and Delta Transforms

Beyond the geometric interpretation lies a powerful algebraic generalization. The theorem has been extended by considering “delta transforms” of square arrays. A delta transform is defined as a one-to-one substitution procedure in which each entry of an array (often arising from a Latin square or a similar combinatorial object) is replaced by a fixed diamond pattern—a diagonally divided, two–colored unit square. (cullinaneUnknownyearexamples pages 1-1) When applied to structured arrays such as the Klein group table (which itself can be viewed as a Latin square over GF(4)), the delta transform preserves the symmetry properties inherent in the original configuration. This invariance under delta transforms implies that the entire algebra generated by the images of the Klein group table under G comprises solely symmetrical arrays. More precisely, these images generate an ideal in a larger ring—a ring of 4096 symmetric patterns—from which one can extract an ideal consisting of 1024 “diamond” patterns. The algebraic structure revealed in this manner is so robust that it generalizes to an infinite family of diamond rings, each of which is isomorphic to a matrix ring over GF(4). (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5, cullinaneUnknownyearexamples pages 1-1) This connection to matrix rings over finite fields accentuates the deep interplay between combinatorial design and algebraic structures.

6. Connections with Latin Square Geometry and Finite Projective Spaces

Another fascinating aspect of the Cullinane diamond theorem is its relation to Latin square geometry—a classical topic in combinatorics that deals with square arrays in which each symbol occurs exactly once per row and once per column. In some of Cullinane’s later work, particularly in his study of Latin-square geometry, it is shown that the six 4×4 Latin squares (that have orthogonal Latin mates) can be embedded into a set of 35 arrays in a manner that mirrors the correspondence between the diamond images and the 35 lines of PG(3,2). (cullinaneUnknownyearlatinsquaregeometry pages 1-6) In this interpretation, the orthogonality property of Latin squares is translated into a geometric condition: two Latin squares are orthogonal if and only if the corresponding lines in PG(3,2) are skew (that is, they do not intersect). This geometric visualization not only provides intuition for the phenomenon of orthogonality but also serves as an explicit bridge between classical combinatorial design and finite projective geometry. In doing so, it enriches our understanding of both domains while demonstrating the versatility of the diamond theorem’s underlying principles.

7. Symmetry Groups and the Miracle Octad Generator

The permutation group G, with its staggering order of 322,560, is by itself an object of intense interest in group theory. Much more than a tool for rearranging tiles, G is isomorphic to the affine group acting on the 4-dimensional linear space over GF(2). This same group appears elsewhere in mathematics, in particular as the octad stabilizer in the Mathieu group M24, a sporadic simple group that plays a central role in combinatorial design and coding theory. In fact, R. T. Curtis’s Miracle Octad Generator (MOG)—developed as a way to generate and study the Golay code (an exceptional error–correcting code) and related combinatorial structures—utilizes a configuration strongly reminiscent of the diamond–theorem figures. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5, kellyUnknownyearmathieugroupsthe pages 1-1) This correspondence highlights the deep algebraic and combinatorial unity underlying what might initially appear as unrelated phenomena: the design of quilt patterns and the structure of error–correcting codes.

8. Detailed Group–Theoretic and Algebraic Underpinnings

To appreciate the full depth of the Cullinane diamond theorem, it is instructive to examine the group–theoretic foundations in greater detail. The generator set for the group G comprises three independent types of permutations—those acting on rows, on columns, and on the four 2×2 quadrants. This decomposition implies that every element of G can be represented as a combination of three distinct permutations, each contributing to the overall transformation of the array D. When these permutations are interpreted within the framework of an affine vector space over GF(2), one observes that their composition corresponds to linear transformations accompanied by translations. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5) This realization not only explains why G is isomorphic to an affine group but also establishes a link between the combinatorial structure of the tiled array and the rich theory of finite fields and linear algebra. Such a connection is essential to both the formulation and the proof of the theorem.

9. The Role of the Finite Field GF(2) and Projective Geometry

The finite field GF(2) consists of just two elements—0 and 1—which endow any vector space over GF(2) with a binary structure. In the context of the diamond theorem, every tile’s coloring, as well as the additive relations in the line diagrams, are naturally described by elements of GF(2). Moreover, the projective space PG(3,2) arises from considering the nonzero vectors in the four–dimensional space over GF(2) up to scalar multiples. PG(3,2) contains exactly 15 points and 35 lines; it is precisely this enumeration of lines that inspires the classification of the 840 images of D into 35 equivalence classes. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5) The binary addition (mod 2) property of the three line diagrams representing each class mirrors the fact that, in PG(3,2), any three collinear points obey a linear relation summing to zero. This elegant correspondence between abstract finite geometry and the tangible patterns of a tiled array is one of the most striking features of the theorem.

10. Delta Transforms and Their Combinatorial Invariance

An additional layer of sophistication in the theorem’s framework is provided by the concept of delta transforms. A delta transform is a systematic substitution process in which every entry of a square array (often drawn from a four–element set) is replaced by a fixed, diagonally divided two–colored tile. (cullinaneUnknownyearexamples pages 1-1) When Delta transforms are applied to the table corresponding to the Klein group, the resulting new arrays (called delta transforms of the Klein group table) retain either ordinary symmetry or color–interchange symmetry. This invariance is maintained under the full group G, which means that the delta transform itself is an operation that commutes with the action of G. The combinatorial invariant arising from the delta transforms is highly significant because it allows one to define sums and products on the set of G–images of D, thereby generating a ring of symmetric patterns. In particular, this ring contains an ideal consisting of 1024 diamond patterns and generalizes to an infinite family of diamond rings isomorphic to matrix rings over GF(4). (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5, cullinaneUnknownyearexamples pages 1-1) The elegance of this result lies in the seamless transition from a discrete combinatorial construct to a rich algebraic structure.

11. Latin Square Geometry and Embeddings into PG(3,2)

The principles behind the Cullinane diamond theorem have further inspired research into Latin square geometry. In the special case of 4×4 Latin squares, it has been shown that the six Latin squares possessing orthogonal Latin mates can be embedded within a configuration of 35 arrays. (cullinaneUnknownyearlatinsquaregeometry pages 1-6) In this embedding, the traditional notion of orthogonality of Latin squares—originally based on combinatorial criteria—corresponds exactly to the geometric property of skewness (i.e., the non–intersection of lines) in the projective space PG(3,2). This geometric interpretation offers not only a new perspective on the classical problem of constructing mutually orthogonal Latin squares but also demonstrates that the diamond theorem’s reach extends well beyond its original domain of tiling patterns. The correspondence essentially means that the combinatorial structure of a Latin square is mirrored in the arrangement of lines in a finite projective space, and the multiple representations provided by the delta transform further cement this connection. (cullinaneUnknownyearlatinsquaregeometry pages 1-6) This interplay between Latin square geometry and finite projective spaces opens up opportunities for deeper exploration of geometrical invariants and symmetric designs.

12. Symmetry in Applications: From Facility Location to Visual Secret Sharing

While the Cullinane diamond theorem is rooted in abstract combinatorial and geometric concepts, its influence extends into various applied fields. In the domain of facility location, for example, researchers have exploited similar “diamond” structures to characterize regions where optimal locations occur under the rectilinear (L1) norm, as these regions naturally form diamond–shaped loci defined by distance constraints. (giannikos1993optimallocationof pages 17-23) Even though these applications focus on geometric optimization rather than algebraic symmetry, the underlying idea—namely the robustness of diamond–shaped invariances under transformation—is intimately connected to the theorem. Similarly, in the realm of computer graphics and cryptographic visual secret sharing, the diamond theorem provides the structural foundation for generating correlation patterns. In such schemes, 4×4 diamond patterns are sequentially applied to non-overlapping blocks of an image to ensure both secure partitioning and reconstruction of the original visual information. (harish2016newvisualsecret pages 1-2) These diverse applications underscore the theorem’s versatility; its central theme of a combinatorial invariant under a massive symmetry group serves as a unifying idea that transcends disciplinary boundaries.

13. Computational and Algorithmic Considerations

The explicit description of the permutation group G and the classification of the 840 images into 35 equivalence classes have also motivated algorithmic approaches for pattern generation and classification. For instance, when one wishes to generate all possible G–images of D, it is computationally efficient to recognize that these images naturally fall into 35 distinct classes corresponding to the 35 lines in PG(3,2). Such insights reduce the complexity of computational searches and enable the practical implementation of algorithms in computer graphics, pattern recognition, and combinatorial design. (coqart1978computergraphicsgrid pages 3-3) Moreover, the delta transform method has been implemented in algebraic software packages to construct large rings of symmetric patterns—a development that has implications for both theoretical investigations and real-world problem solving in areas such as coding theory and error–correction. The connection to matrix rings over GF(4) is particularly promising, as it provides an algebraic framework for dealing with vast families of symmetric objects in a systematic manner.

14. Comparative Analysis with Other Geometrical Theorems

It is instructive to compare the Cullinane diamond theorem with other well-known geometric and combinatorial results. In contrast to classical theorems that rely solely on continuous symmetries or Euclidean transformations, the diamond theorem exploits the combinatorial rigidity of discrete structures. Its reliance on finite fields and projective spaces distinguishes it from many traditional results in geometry. Moreover, while other results in tiling theory or Latin square theory are often limited to ad hoc proofs for specific cases, the Cullinane diamond theorem offers a unifying algebraic–geometric framework that explains not only why symmetric patterns occur but also how they are structured in an entirely discrete setting. This synthesis of group theory, finite geometry, and combinatorial design represents an advance over previous approaches that tended to treat these areas in isolation. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5, cullinaneUnknownyearlatinsquaregeometry pages 1-6)

15. Historical Context and the Evolution of the Theorem

The origins of the Cullinane diamond theorem can be traced back to investigations into the symmetry properties of classical tile patterns, including those found in quilts and combinatorial designs. Earlier research, such as that on the delta transforms of the Klein group table, hinted at the possibility that simple tiling arrangements might possess highly non–trivial symmetry properties. Over time, these insights matured into the full–fledged theorem attributed to Steven H. Cullinane, which formalized the connection between a 4×4 diamond figure and the affine group over GF(2). The subsequent discovery of the correspondence between the 840 images and the 35 lines in PG(3,2) further entrenched the theorem’s role as a bridge between discrete combinatorial designs and classical finite projective geometry. In recent years, further work on Latin square geometry and visual secret sharing has expanded the theorem’s impact well beyond its original context, demonstrating that the ideas encapsulated in the diamond theorem are not only mathematically deep but also broadly applicable. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5, cullinaneUnknownyearlatinsquaregeometry pages 1-6)

16. Implications for Future Research

The implications of the Cullinane diamond theorem are manifold. On the theoretical side, the theorem points to a rich interplay between discrete geometry, group theory, and algebra that should be explored in greater depth. One promising direction is the extension of the theorem to higher–order arrays and to patterns with more than two colors. Such generalizations would likely lead to the discovery of new equivalence classes and perhaps even connect with higher–dimensional projective spaces. Another area ripe for exploration is the further algebraic analysis of the ring structures generated by delta transforms. In particular, the isomorphism of infinite families of diamond rings to matrix rings over GF(4) suggests deep algebraic symmetries that have yet to be fully exploited. On the applied side, insights derived from the Cullinane diamond theorem have already found applications in facility location, computer graphics, and cryptographic visual secret sharing; further research may reveal additional uses in coding theory, error–correction, and possibly even in the design of secure communication protocols. (cullinaneUnknownyearlatinsquaregeometry pages 1-6, harish2016newvisualsecret pages 1-2)

17. Concluding Remarks

In summary, the Cullinane diamond theorem is a landmark result that provides a unified explanation for the surprising symmetry properties observed in the four–diamond figure D. When D is subjected to the full action of the permutation group G (of order 322,560), every image obtained—amounting to a total of 840 distinct patterns—exhibits either ordinary or color–interchange symmetry. These images can be uniquely categorized into 35 equivalence classes, each corresponding to a line in the finite projective space PG(3,2). The representation of these classes by three line diagrams whose binary sum is zero not only reinforces the connection with the additive structure of GF(2) but also ties the entire construction to the elegant framework of finite projective geometry. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5) Further, by introducing delta transforms on square arrays, the theorem extends into an algebraic domain—revealing that the set of symmetric images forms an ideal in a ring of symmetric patterns, with striking isomorphisms to matrix rings over GF(4). This algebraic perspective has fostered connections to Latin square geometry, where the orthogonality of Latin squares is naturally interpreted in terms of skew lines in PG(3,2), and to the combinatorial structures underlying the Miracle Octad Generator and Mathieu groups. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5, kellyUnknownyearmathieugroupsthe pages 1-1) Ultimately, the Cullinane diamond theorem stands as a testament to the power of combining combinatorial, geometric, and algebraic methods to reveal and classify deep symmetry properties in discrete structures. Its continued influence across diverse fields—from pure mathematics to applied design and cryptographic systems—underscores both its elegance and its far–reaching impact. (harish2016newvisualsecret pages 1-2)

This comprehensive investigation thus not only answers the question “What is the Cullinane diamond theorem?” but also situates it firmly within a larger mathematical landscape that continues to develop and inspire new research.

References

1. (cullinane2013thediamondtheorem pages 1-5): SH Cullinane. The diamond theorem. arXiv: Group Theory, Aug 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1308.1075, doi:10.48550/arxiv.1308.1075. This article has 2 citations.

2. (cullinaneUnknownyearlatinsquaregeometry pages 1-6): SH Cullinane. Latin-square geometry. Unknown journal, Unknown year.

3. (giannikos1993optimallocationof pages 17-23): I Giannikos. Optimal location of single and multiple obnoxious facilities: algorithms for the maximin criterion under different norms. Unknown journal, 1993.

4. (coqart1978computergraphicsgrid pages 3-3): Roger Coqart. Computer graphics: grid structures. Leonardo, 11:118-119, Jan 1978. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1574008, doi:10.2307/1574008. This article has 3 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

5. (harish2016newvisualsecret pages 1-2): V. Harish, N. Rajesh Kumar, and N. R. Raajan. New visual secret sharing scheme for gray-level images using diamond theorem correlation pattern structure. 2016 International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), pages 1-5, Mar 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/iccpct.2016.7530155, doi:10.1109/iccpct.2016.7530155. This article has 1 citations.

6. (kellyUnknownyearmathieugroupsthe pages 1-1): S Kelly. Mathieu groups, the golay code and curtis' miracle octad generator. Unknown journal, Unknown year.