Sunday, March 5, 2017
The Klostermann Weekend
Sunday, July 31, 2022
Domingo for Ramos*
The reference to Vallega-Neu in posts that last night were tagged
The Ereignis Sanction leads to . . .
Heidegger’s ‘Contributions to Philosophy.’ An Introduction .
(Indiana University Press, 2003).
That book is about . . .
Martin Heidegger, Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning) ,
trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly (Bloomington:
Indiana University Press, 1999). German edition:
Beiträge zur Philosophie (vom Ereignis) ,
ed. F.-W. von Herrmann, Gesamtausgabe, vol. 65
(Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann, 1989).
* See today's news and a Log24 search for "Philippine."
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
“The Stone” Today Suggests…
The Philosopher's Gaze , by David Michael Levin, The post-metaphysical question—question for a post-metaphysical phenomenology—is therefore: Can the perceptual field, the ground of perception, be released from our historical compulsion to represent it in a way that accommodates our will to power and its need to totalize and reify the presencing of being? In other words: Can the ground be experienced as ground? Can its hermeneutical way of presencing, i.e., as a dynamic interplay of concealment and unconcealment, be given appropriate respect in the receptivity of a perception that lets itself be appropriated by the ground and accordingly lets the phenomenon of the ground be what and how it is? Can the coming-to-pass of the ontological difference that is constitutive of all the local figure-ground differences taking place in our perceptual field be made visible hermeneutically, and thus without violence to its withdrawal into concealment? But the question concerning the constellation of figure and ground cannot be separated from the question concerning the structure of subject and object. Hence the possibility of a movement beyond metaphysics must also think the historical possibility of breaking out of this structure into the spacing of the ontological difference: différance , the primordial, sensuous, ekstatic écart . As Heidegger states it in his Parmenides lectures, it is a question of "the way historical man belongs within the bestowal of being (Zufügung des Seins ), i.e., the way this order entitles him to acknowledge being and to be the only being among all beings to see the open" (PE* 150, PG** 223. Italics added). We might also say that it is a question of our response-ability, our capacity as beings gifted with vision, to measure up to the responsibility for perceptual responsiveness laid down for us in the "primordial de-cision" (Entscheid ) of the ontological difference (ibid.). To recognize the operation of the ontological difference taking place in the figure-ground difference of the perceptual Gestalt is to recognize the ontological difference as the primordial Riß , the primordial Ur-teil underlying all our perceptual syntheses and judgments—and recognize, moreover, that this rift, this division, decision, and scission, an ekstatic écart underlying and gathering all our so-called acts of perception, is also the only "norm" (ἀρχή ) by which our condition, our essential deciding and becoming as the ones who are gifted with sight, can ultimately be judged. * PE: Parmenides of Heidegger in English— Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992 ** PG: Parmenides of Heidegger in German— Gesamtausgabe , vol. 54— Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1992 |
Examples of "the primordial Riß " as ἀρχή —
For an explanation in terms of mathematics rather than philosophy,
see the diamond theorem. For more on the Riß as ἀρχή , see
Function Decomposition Over a Finite Field.
Wednesday, June 7, 2006
Wednesday June 7, 2006
TIME magazine, issue dated June 12, 2006, item posted Sunday, June 4, 2006:
IF AT FIRST YOU DON'T SUCCEED …
By JULIE RAWE
"Nervous kids and obscure words are not the stuff of big-time TV, but this year's Scripps National Spelling Bee was an improbable nail-biter. One of the 13 finalists got reinstated after judges made a spelling error, a Canadian came in second–who knew foreign kids could compete?–and KATHARINE CLOSE, 13, prevailed in her fifth year. The eighth-grader from Spring Lake, N.J., won with ursprache. It means protolanguage. Now try to use it in conversation."
quoting Heidegger:
originary language
(Ursprache)…"
— Heidegger, Erlauterungen
zu Holderlins Dichtung.
Frankfurt am Main:
Klostermann, 1971: 41.
(Skewed Mirrors,
Sept. 14, 2003)
"Evil did not have
the last word."
— Richard John Neuhaus,
April 4, 2005
"This is the exact opposite
of what echthroi do in
their X-ing or un-naming."
— Wikipedia on
A Wind in the Door
"Lps. The keys to. Given! A way a lone a last a loved a long the PARIS, 1922-1939" — James Joyce, Finnegans Wake |
"There is never any ending
to Paris."
— Ernest Hemingway