See Sartwell in this journal and . . .
"Read something that means something." — New Yorker motto.
From a search for Alperin in this journal —
See as well . . .
. . . and posts tagged Alperin.
On its current homepage, the American Mathematical Society
links to a Nov. 15 blog post illustrating the Stan Lee approach
to mathematics:
Stories: "Math needs more stories. All kinds of stories…" —
See too Mathematics and Narrative in this journal.
” . . . the 3 by 3, the six-sided, three-layer configuration of
the original Rubik’s Cube, which bestows an illusion of brilliance
on those who can solve it.”
— John Branch in the online New York Times today,
“Children of the Cube”:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/15/sports/
cubing-usa-nationals-max-park.html
Cube-solving, like other sports, allows for displays of
impressive and admirable skill, if not “brilliance.”
The mathematics — group theory — that is sometimes associated
with Rubik’s Cube is, however, not a sport. See Rubik + Group
in this journal.
From a 1984 book review:
"After three decades of intensive research by hundreds of group theorists, the century old problem of the classification of the finite simple groups has been solved and the whole field has been drastically changed. A few years ago the one focus of attention was the program for the classification; now there are many active areas including the study of the connections between groups and geometries, sporadic groups and, especially, the representation theory. A spate of books on finite groups, of different breadths and on a variety of topics, has appeared, and it is a good time for this to happen. Moreover, the classification means that the view of the subject is quite different; even the most elementary treatment of groups should be modified, as we now know that all finite groups are made up of groups which, for the most part, are imitations of Lie groups using finite fields instead of the reals and complexes. The typical example of a finite group is
— Jonathan L. Alperin,
review of books on group theory,
Bulletin (New Series) of the American
Mathematical Society 10 (1984) 121, doi:
10.1090/S0273-0979-1984-15210-8
The same example
at Wolfram.com:
Citation data from Wolfram.com:
"GL(2,p) and GL(3,3) Acting on Points"
from The Wolfram Demonstrations Project,
http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/GL2PAndGL33ActingOnPoints/,
Contributed by: Ed Pegg Jr"
As well as displaying Cullinane's 48 pictures of group actions from 1985, the Pegg program displays many, many more actions of small finite general linear groups over finite fields. It illustrates Cullinane's 1985 statement:
"Actions of GL(2,p) on a p×p coordinate-array have the same sorts of symmetries, where p is any odd prime."
Pegg's program also illustrates actions on a cubical array– a 3×3×3 array acted on by GL(3,3). For some other actions on cubical arrays, see Cullinane's Finite Geometry of the Square and Cube.
A Miniature
Rosetta Stone
John Baez discussed (Sept. 6, 2003) the analogies of Weil, and he himself furnished another such Rosetta stone on a much smaller scale:
“… a 24-element group called the ‘binary tetrahedral group,’ a 24-element group called ‘SL(2,Z/3),’ and the vertices of a regular polytope in 4 dimensions called the ’24-cell.’ The most important fact is that these are all the same thing!”
For further details, see Wikipedia on the 24-cell, on special linear groups, and on Hurwitz quaternions,
The group SL(2,Z/3), also known as “SL(2,3),” is of course derived from the general linear group GL(2,3). For the relationship of this group to the quaternions, see the Log24 entry for August 4 (the birthdate of the discoverer of quaternions, Sir William Rowan Hamilton).
The 3×3 square shown above may, as my August 4 entry indicates, be used to picture the quaternions and, more generally, the 48-element group GL(2,3). It may therefore be regarded as the structure underlying the miniature Rosetta stone described by Baez.
“The typical example of a finite group is GL(n,q), the general linear group of n dimensions over the field with q elements. The student who is introduced to the subject with other examples is being completely misled.”
— J. L. Alperin, book review,
Bulletin (New Series) of the American
Mathematical Society 10 (1984), 121
Today's mathematical birthdays:
Saunders Mac Lane, John Venn,
and Sir William Rowan Hamilton.
It is well known that the quaternion group is a subgroup of GL(2,3), the general linear group on the 2-space over GF(3), the 3-element Galois field.
The figures below illustrate this fact.
Related material: Visualizing GL(2,p)
— J. L. Alperin, book review,
Bulletin (New Series) of the American
Mathematical Society 10 (1984), 121
Powered by WordPress