Log24

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Tuesday July 15, 2008

Filed under: General — m759 @ 10:10 pm

My comment on a discussion of elliptic curves and modular forms at Secret Blogging Seminar, about 10 PM tonight:

How does this affect popularized discussions of the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture– for instance, Ivars Peterson’s, in “Curving Beyond Fermat,” November 1999– which claim, for instance, that “Elliptic curves and modular forms are mathematically so different that mathematicians initially [in the 1950’s, the early days of the conjecture] couldn’t believe that the two are related.”?

Update of about 10:45 PM tonight:

A reply by the author of the discussion, Scott Carnahan:

I don’t think anyone doubted that there is a connection between elliptic curves and modular forms on the level I described above. However, the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture refers to a more advanced idea about a deeper connection.

Carnahan then gives a one-paragraph summary, definitely not popularized, of the deeper connection.

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress