Monday, May 14, 2012

Mathematics, Logic, and Faith

Filed under: General,Geometry — m759 @ 4:44 PM

From the NY Times  philosophy column "The Stone" 
yesterday at 5 PM—

Timothy Williamson, Wykeham Professor of Logic at Oxford,
claims that all the theorems of mathematics

"… are ultimately derived from a few simple axioms
by chains of logical reasoning, some of them
hundreds of pages long…."

Williamson gives as an example recent (1986-1995)
work on Fermat's conjecture.

He does not, however, cite any axioms or "chains of
logical reasoning" in support of his claim that 
a proof of Fermat's conjecture can be so derived.

Here is a chain of reasoning that forms a crucial part
of recent arguments for the truth of Fermat's conjecture—

K. A. Ribet, "On modular representations of Gal(Q̄/Q)
arising from modular forms
," Invent. Math. 100 (1990), 431-476.

Whether this chain of reasoning is in fact logical  is no easy question.
It is not the sort of argument easily reduced to a series of purely
logical symbol-strings that could be checked by a computer.

Few mathematicians, even now, can follow each step
in the longer chain of reasoning that led to a June 1993 claim
that Fermat's conjecture is true. 

Williamson is not a mathematician, and his view of
Fermat's conjecture as a proven fact is clearly based
not on logic, but on faith.

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress