"Recently, several leading academic journals and publishers
updated their submission guidelines to explicitly ban researchers
from listing ChatGPT as a co-author, or using text copied from a
ChatGPT response. Some professors have criticized these bans
as shortsightedly resistant to an inevitable technological change.
We shouldn’t be surprised at the disagreement. This is a new
ethical space that only roughly follows the outlines of our existing
agreements on plagiarism, authorship criteria, and fraud.
Precisely where to draw red lines is not clear."
— Ben Chrisinger, Feb. 22, 2023, in The Chronicle of Higher Education
Flashback to Log24 on Dec. 11, 2022 —
|
Compare and Contrast:
The Source:
A perhaps more interesting digital assistant
|
See as well "red line overload" in the previous post.
